chick-fil-a and anti christian bigotsSometime prior to 7/16 – Dan Cathy interview with Baptist Press: http://www.bpnews.net/bpnews.asp?id=38271

Thursday 7/19 – (as proven by google cache of 3AM 7/20) – Chick-fil-A issues statement stating that they will be recalling Jim Henson’s “Creature Shop Kid’s Meal Toy” as a “necessary precaution.” - This is what is sometimes referred to as taking the “high road” in corporate circles.

Still available to see at (http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache%3AiET6sMr6mXIJ)

Friday 7/20 (undisputed) – JHC announces: “The Jim Henson Company has celebrated and embraced diversity and inclusiveness for over fifty years and we have notified Chick-Fil-A that we do not wish to partner with them on any future endeavors. Lisa Henson, our CEO is personally a strong supporter of gay marriage and has directed us to donate the payment we received from Chick-Fil-A to GLAAD.” – This would be the “low road”.  – Notice no mention of their toys, or the previous decision of Chick-Fil-A to stop providing them.

Friday 7/20 after JHC announcement (undisputed) – this from Boston’s official Facebook page: “In recent days you said Chick-fil-A opposes same-sex marriage and said the generation that supports it has an ‘arrogant attitude.’

Now — incredibly — your company says you are backing out of the same-sex marriage debate. I urge you to back out of your plans to locate in Boston.” – Note the blatant distortion of the facts. The word “oppose” appears once in the interview, spoken by the interviewer: “Some have opposed the company’s support of the traditional family.”

Then Rahm Emanuel follows suit… leading to public outrage. Most of which directed at these politicians for using their office as a bat to “oppose the company’s support of the traditional family” resulting in major #fail.

“…I pray God’s mercy on our generation that has such a prideful, arrogant attitude to think that we have the audacity to define what marriage is about.”That’s what he really said. Very similar to this popular meme-like banner that GLAAD themselves would endorse:

http://www.homoquotables.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/Drew-Barrymore.jpg

The problem with creating a false dichotomy is that you have to recognize it from both sides. If their support of traditional marriage equates to opposition of gay marriage, then your support of gay marriage equates to opposition of traditional marriage. It’s a solved formula, as close to a mathematical proof as any verbal argument could hope to achieve. Chick-fil-a does NOT oppose gay marriage, they support traditional marriage. If you would like to argue that one means the other, feel free to attempt it without classifying yourself a bigot. That is why my meme was popular. This is why memes are valuable. I’ll be surprised if anyone actually reads all of that, but the meme was read by thousands.

Leave A Comment, Written on September 4th, 2012 , WWJD?

the big sort book
“WHY THE CLUSTERING OF LIKE-MINDED AMERICA IS TEARING US APART”

That’s easy to say, of course Jesus hung out with non-like-minded people, but he was changing them. Then there was that whole temple flea-market incident. There is nothing profound unless one presents some specifics. To claim that it is the “Holy Spirit” anytime someone manages to ignore what they perceive to be evil, is reckless & uninspired. In fact it is quite contradictory. “Turning the other cheek” (Matthew 5:39) is clearly the Holy Spirit but it represents the ability to absorb personal attacks WITHOUT succumbing. It does not represent succumbing.

Unfortunately, the separation exists for a reason. Like that between “progressive” Christians and me. Too often people believe biting off their own tongue amounts to fulfilling the “love your enemies” (Matthew 5:44) or some other doormat interpretation of that stark challenge to speak the truth out of love and not competition. That is more difficult than just being mean but it doesn’t mean biting off our tongues. It also doesn’t mean that every accusation that we are still being “mean” is true. Jesus was no doormat. He called Peter Satan (Matthew 16:23), he told all those people to STOP SINNING (John 8:11)… he called the Pharisees “white washed” and full of “dead man’s bones” (Matthew 23:27).

I find hippie theology dull and cowardly, not lionhearted like Jesus was. Who said truth wouldn’t be dull though? So I cannot dismiss it entirely. Iron sharpens iron (Proverbs 27:17), but funny thing is how often does iron recognize itself when it sees it? I have to keep reminding myself, I know good guys that believe this stuff. They have a different perspective… they’re smart, and how much does 1 sentence convey anyway… I want to value antique trends more than modern trends. I want to understand their fascination with old wine skins, mostly because the supposed “new” ones don’t seem to have any wine in them. So 1 sentence at a time I continue to try to make sense of their thoughts.

There are people that should not mingle. “Have NOTHING to do with them” (2 Timothy 3:5, interestingly directly exactly toward those who “have a form of godliness”) … then there is iron + iron = sharpen (Proverbs 27:17). What is the Church if it is not the “clustering of the like minded”??? Many modern churches have turned to trendy & popularity based philosophies to support huge numbers and huge budgets. A drastic contradiction to the words of Jesus, IMO, but then… they do have a different perspective, that pains me to hear… even abrasive. :-\ They equate being “in the world” to being “of the world”. It’s a fine line indeed, but how many Facebook friends you have is no way to judge this. (1 John 2:15-17, Romans 12:2, John 17:16,18)

The circular reasoning continues until an answer is found. Perhaps it never will be?

Leave A Comment, Written on July 19th, 2012 , Being like Jesus, WWJD?

Existential DilemmaIt is not likely that your favorite pet ever considered the meaning of life. In fact it is nearly certain that it did not. However, it is equally certain that every human on the planet probably has. Reflecting on the meaning of life is probably near the top of the list of activities that makes humans different from the rest of the animals. It may also be the fundamental question at the root of all spirituality.

“Why am I here?” As common it is to ask this same question, the answers are far from similar. In fact our own opinion, of our own purpose, may well change daily. However dissimilar our answers to the specifics, the question of “God” will undoubtedly require resolution. In fact, without a creator, the whole concept of purpose is lost. Without a creator one cannot resolve the existential dilemma because without a creator there is no dilemma, there is no purpose.

δί-λημμα – Greek literally meaning “double proposition” is a problem offering two possibilities. A dilemma. The two possibilities are that there is either a creator, and therefore a purpose, or there is no creator, which removes the possibility of purpose.

In mankind’s quest for resolution on this topic we have tried some pretty clever strategies to quiet that noisy aspect of our consciousness. For instance, ancestor worship. If we cannot fathom a creator we certainly can acknowledge our parent’s role in the process. However, once they cease to be with us we are forced to make the same leap into the mystical. How can “purpose” die and still offer relief to this nagging question? Therefore our parents must still be there, they must still be listening. Problem solved.

Unfortunately, once the mystical is invoked the question of “who else” is “still there” will follow. Who was the parent of the first parents? This line of thinking offers limited relief.

Now I’d like to consider a popular thought of today. We are, after all, the “most evolved” humans to have ever existed in all of history are we not? So what about secular humanism? Well, for the secular humanist, specifically the atheist, the one who claims to have concluded (and by doing resolved) their quest for meaning. For them, there is simply no purpose, or as they would say, they make their own purpose (half dozen of one, 6 of the other). I can only imagine that they have resolved the question, because for my mind, while “none of the above” is a possibility; “none at all” would offer no relief at all. No relief to that nagging suspicion that mankind could never have arrived at a place where we are asking “why am I here” without there being an answer. It would create a “chicken and egg” paradox, at least by my calculation. In fact, we would not even have to be able to ask the question for the answer to exist. In fact the answer must exist for anything at all to exist.

So now I invite you to participate in a dangerous experiment. Get in a quite place, close your eyes, and try as earnestly as possible to consider existence divorced from meaning. It is very difficult to imagine, even for atheists, but you’ll know you have experienced it by the sadness. A sadness that is intolerable. A sadness that seems capable of stopping your heart at just a glimpse. You will feel yourself dying, and that is not a biological death, but a spiritual one. Quick, snap out of it!

It’s a scary thing but everyone must go there some day. Many procrastinate this until their last moments, in the meantime focusing entirely on whatever happens to be in front of their eyes. Yes, it seems a sure thing, that some just ignore that nagging unresolved dilemma. However it seems as certain that none are immune to it. We are not “meant” to live our lives just following our every impulse and somehow we just “know” this.

Now, after all of that, for those that embrace the existence of God, how do we know that we have resolved the dilemma? Well, the word FAITH should come to mind. At the end of the new Star Trek movie when young Mr. Spock meets old Mr. Spock: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Ppo5YIYwTM.

[Spock notices a elder Vulcan walking in the docking bay]
Spock: Father!
[the elder Vulcan turns and is revealed as Spock Prime]
Spock Prime: I am not our father.
[Young Spock, now recognizing who he is, approaches]
Spock Prime: There are so few Vulcans left, we cannot afford to ignore each other.
Spock: Then why did you send Kirk aboard when you alone could have explained the truth?
Spock Prime: Because you needed each other. I could not deprive you of the revelation of all that you could accomplish together, of a friendship that will define you both in ways you cannot yet realize.
Spock: How did you persuade him to keep your secret?
Spock Prime: We inferred that universe-ending paradoxes would ensue should he break his promise.
Spock: You lied.
Spock Prime: Aww… I… I implied.
Spock: A gamble.
Spock Prime: An act of faith. One I hope that you will repeat in your future in Starfleet.

The beauty of this scene, and the whole concept of Vulcans (the race of Spock), is that those without faith must rely entirely on logic. For them to do otherwise becomes its own kind of evil. However, Christians make this mistake daily. We claim to have resolved the question of “purpose”, of God’s existence, and His promises. Then for some reason we live like Vulcans. Unwilling to take a chance. Unwilling to risk any of the consequences that our “logic” warns us “could” befall. If we are afraid to “do” what we believe God tells us to do then we really have not yet resolved our dilemma. We really are not sure of what we hope for. Maybe we are supposed to spend our lives “unsure”. One thing is sure, if a Christian is unsure, and the secular humanist is unsure, then they aren’t really that different are they? At least not so far as their quest for meaning.

Ecclesiastes 11
New International Version (NIV)

1 Ship your grain across the sea;
after many days you may receive a return.
2 Invest in seven ventures, yes, in eight;
you do not know what disaster may come upon the land.
3 If clouds are full of water,
they pour rain on the earth.
Whether a tree falls to the south or to the north,
in the place where it falls, there it will lie.
4 Whoever watches the wind will not plant;
whoever looks at the clouds will not reap.
5 As you do not know the path of the wind,
or how the body is formed[a] in a mother’s womb,
so you cannot understand the work of God,
the Maker of all things.
6 Sow your seed in the morning,
and at evening let your hands not be idle,
for you do not know which will succeed,
whether this or that,
or whether both will do equally well.

7 Light is sweet,
and it pleases the eyes to see the sun.
8 However many years anyone may live,
let them enjoy them all.
But let them remember the days of darkness,
for there will be many.
Everything to come is meaningless.
9 You who are young, be happy while you are young,
and let your heart give you joy in the days of your youth.
Follow the ways of your heart
and whatever your eyes see,
but know that for all these things
God will bring you into judgment.
10 So then, banish anxiety from your heart
and cast off the troubles of your body,
for youth and vigor are meaningless.

2 Comments, Written on June 11th, 2012 , WWJD?

Other Side of the World & Back Again is proudly powered by WordPress and the Theme Adventure by Eric Schwarz
Entries (RSS) and Comments (RSS).

Other Side of the World & Back Again

Getting to know Jesus.